perm filename TWOMOQ.ESS[ESS,JMC] blob
sn#727152 filedate 1983-10-11 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ā VALID 00002 PAGES
C REC PAGE DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002 1975 mar 26
C00009 ENDMK
Cā;
1975 mar 26
TWO MODELS OF POLITICAL ECONOMY
A person's attitude to economic and political policy is often
determined by his implicit acceptance of one of two extreme
conceptual models of how economic rewards are obtained:
1. It is possible to regard the world as resource limited.
In this case what a person gets is determined by what share of the
resources he is allocated, and the main problem of society is
political - how to carry out this allocation fairly.
2. The alternative is to regard the world as work limited.
What is produced is determined by how much and how well people work,
and the main problem of society is economic - how to motivate people
to work well and to provide proper conditions for the exchange of
what they produce.
When the issue is put this precisely, I suppose most people
will say that some rewards are resource limited and some are work
limited. Moreover, the general theory of economics is capable of
dealing with both extremes and with the mixed cases in between.
However, while people will admit resource and work
limitations in principle, people are limited in what they can keep in
mind at one time, and a given individual tends to concentrate his
attention in one direction or another. Moreover, the extreme cases
are useful approximations to reality.
In this essay, I am interested in two questions:
1. In what ways is our country and our world resource or work
limited? In this, I shall take the position that we are mainly work
limited, even though much current writing seems to assume the
reverse.
2. How are people's ideas on this matter affected by their
condition of life? Herein, I have come to the almost Marxist
position that people's ideas on %2this matter%1 are substantially
affected by their relation to the means of production as it affects
whether %2their own%1 rewards are perceived as allocated or earned.
As to the facts, the matter is somewhat complicated. Whether
a reward is resource or work limited depends on the time-scale
considered, the reward itself, and on the person. Let us consider
a number of kinds of goods separately.
1. %3Energy%1. In the very short run, energy is resource limited.
There is a certain amount of gasoline in the tanks, and we have to
make do with it. Normally there is enough so that people's use of it
is determined by their habits which in turn are determined by the
price and how it affects their allocation of their personal resources.
For most people, the price of gasoline is not the determining factor
in its use in the short run. Whether you drive your car to a Ski Resort
is determined by other factors of convenience and cost than the
price of gasoline.
In the slightly longer run, work limitations come in. The
oil well can be pumped faster, and more men can be hired to dig
coal.
1981 oct 11
In the 20 year to billion year time scale, we are solely
work limited, at least for amounts of energy no larger than
thousands of times the amount we now use. It is important to
note that this question cannot be decided by the laws of economics
alone. It depends on the technological fact that breeder reactors
and mining heat produced by nuclear explosions will both work and
allow the use of such low concentrations of uranium, thorium and
lithium that the earth's crust provides plenty.
It also depends on the sociological fact (assumption) that society
can organize itself to use such sources of energy.
1981 Nov 4
In the very short run, we are resource limited. What has
been produced exists. If there were no question of producing more,
then it might be reasonable to divide what exists evenly. I suppose
that people taking a short run view tend to regard the world as
resource limited.
Somewhere there's another file about this with the models of
breadfruit island and potato island.